I have been fascinated to watch the virus-like quality of the current meme flooding new age circles which states that the Schuman Resonance is increasing. After receiving and being aware of numerous claims which I intuitively felt were misleading, I did my own research and also contacted a number of reputable sources of real time information on the Schumann Resonances. One was an electrical engineer, Benjamin Lonetree who not only designs equipment for monitoring the SR's, but has been engaged in monitoring the levels for almost 20 years. The other was the Heartmath Institute, whose website and charts many are referring to as their 'proof' that the resonances are increasing. The resounding response to the question is 'No, The Schumann Resonances are NOT Increasing". No matter how much we would like it be so, or to make it fit the paradigm we would like, it simply is not the case. Repeating something often enough does not make it Truth. Those that wish to use 'Science' as the justification for their position on the increase of SR's should ensure that they understand the science they are attempting to use. I received the following statement from Annette Deyhle (Phd), the Research Co-ordinator for the Heartmath Institute : "We have had numerous inquiries regarding postings on Facebook that refer to information on a website suggesting that for the first time in recorded history the Schumann resonance frequency has jumped from 7.8 to 36+ hertz. These statements are inaccurate. Here are some basics about the source of the Schumann Resonances. There is an electromagnetic cavity which acts as a waveguide which exists between the surface of the Earth and the inner edge of the ionosphere which is about 55 kilometers (34 miles) from the Earth’s surface. The Schumann Resonances are quasi-standing electromagnetic waves that exist in this cavity. They occur at the following frequencies, which are determined by the size of the earth/ionosphere cavity; 7.8, 14, 20, 26, 33, 39, 45 and 59 Hertz, with a daily (day-night) variation of about +/- 0.5 Hertz (see Figure 1). So long as the properties of Earth's electromagnetic cavity remains about the same, these frequencies remain the same. The resonant properties of this electromagnetic cavity and the resulting resonant frequencies were first predicted by the German physicist W. O. Schumann in 1952, and were experimentally verified in the late 1950s and early 60s. There are and always have been 8 different Schumann resonance frequencies. They are the same as they were when first measured in the 1960s. Figure 1 shows most of them, although the highest resonant frequency is not in shown in our data as it is very close to the power line frequency of 60 Hz and is filtered out. If the resonant frequencies were changing it would mean the physical geometry of the Earth-ionosphere cavity was changing. The frequencies can and do change temporarily due to solar storm events, etc. which affects ionosphere shape and conditions, but they return to their base frequencies when things settle down. Figure 1 Schuman resonance data recorded from the GCI sensor site in Boulder Creek, Calif. Over many years of monitoring the earth’s magnetic field with the Global Coherence Monitoring System, which uses multiple recording stations strategically located around the earth, we have not observed any evidence for the claim that the frequencies of the Schumann resonances are changing beyond the normal diurnal variation. We also have not seen any evidence reported by other monitoring institutions that there is or has been a fundamental change in the frequency of the Schumann resonances. You can see the live data from the Global Coherence sites at: https://www.heartmath.org/research/global-coherence/gcms-live-data/
What you will also see when looking at the global data is different parts of the planet have different levels of activity at different times, but the resonant frequencies are quite stable over time. It should also be noted that the power (amplitude) in the various resonant frequency bands does change with an annual rhythm. Especially the 2nd and 3rd resonant frequencies. This has also lead to similar misunderstanding in the past reports that claimed the resonant frequencies were increasing as there are increases in the power of these bands (not frequency) – but when you look over several years you clearly see that it then decreases again with an annual cycle. This does not mean that other kinds of “frequencies” related to the shift in consciousness are not increasing – but we cannot measure these, at least yet, and they likely have nothing to do with the Schumann Resonances. For those interested in the deeper science of how the Schumann resonances and other magnetic fields created by the Earth and Sun affect human consciousness, you may enjoy reading the e-book titled The Science of Interconnectivity: http://store.heartmath.org/e-Books/science-of-Interconnectivity.html " Annette further went on to say, "We can evolve and our frequency can increase without Schumann Resonances making a crazy jump". I agree with her. There is no doubt that the electromagnetic conditions on our planet are changing. The region of space we are in is not the same as it was 50 or even 5 years ago as our solar system spirals through our galactic environment. Our spiritual and physical evolution is being fuelled by solar and cosmic activity and many other energetic influences. We are living within a transitional period between extensive cycles with differing energy signatures and our civilisation is adapting to a new consciousness. Many indigenous traditions have foretold of this time, and we are certainly seeing awakening and expanding awareness of the spiritual bondage we have been held to for many thousands of years. Yes, things are changing. We are changing. The SR's spike in power from time to time and we feel the effects of this,,but the fundamental resonances are simply not increasing. The size and shape of the cavity between earth and the ionosphere would need to change in order for this to be so- and this is not happening. You may freely share this post provided the source is credited. Permission has been given by Heartmath institute to share the information they have provided.
12 Comments
I believe Bashar (http://basharchanneledbydarrylanka.org)
Reply
Julie
13/5/2017 02:36:14 am
Thanks so much for your comment. The statement by Bashar is correct, although the height of the ionospheric cavity is also taken into account producing the range of frequencies indicated. They were mathematically predicted and subsequently measured.
Reply
Razz
23/3/2018 01:30:41 am
So, @lasos, you seem to use miles and miles per second (for the speed of light) even though the international scientific standard is the metric system. Counting, using the metric system: 299792.458km/s (the more exact speed of light) divided by the approximate 12,756 km diameter of earth we amount to 23.50207.
Reply
Matt
13/8/2017 02:18:44 pm
So, it's August 13th. Solar activity is low. Extremely unusual spikes are rapidly increasing. Especially the last week or so. Not so sure this explanation fully fits into these large fluctuations in our ionosphere. Sounds more like a weakening magnetic field, resulting in a sloppy bending effect on our magnetic poles. Something just seems off recently.
Reply
Julie
13/8/2017 04:00:17 pm
Thanks Matt. There are a number of factors at play here. The sun may be quiet, however there is a fast moving solar wind (and there have been a few of them over the past few weeks) -this also charges the atmosphere and there have been concurrent auroral displays.
Reply
Admittedly by studies and represented in the graph there are different frequency levels(designated as a "range"). Because SR always fluctuates within this same range does not equate to it NOT having an effect on the behavior of mankind. The human brain has specific frequencies in which have a direct effect on behaviorism.
Reply
21/9/2017 12:47:30 am
You can see the daily Schumann resonance frequencies on the graphs on the British Geological Survey page at http://www.geomag.bgs.ac.uk/research/inductioncoils.html (The induction coils are currently not working but should be rerpaired soon) Note there are differences in the E-W & N-S frequencies possibly due to the difference in the Earth's circumpherance or the height of the ionosphere
Reply
Lola
13/11/2017 09:46:56 pm
The frequency signature itself does not change but the spikes are increasing. The effect on the individual also will depend on where you are. e.g If you are at the tip of Africa, using the HM institute's Live Data Graph you can see the wave for monitor in Hluhluwe in South Africa is spiking way over and above the one in Lithuania. So the exchange of solar particles at the S pole is understandable more immediate than the opposite for example look at the date for November 2017 where the power for the SA monitor goes up to 500hz but the rest of the world is maxing at 200. From Sept to today, 14th Nov there have been 5 outstanding spikes over South Africa compared to zilch elsewhere. Depending on the "local coherence" - i.e how biological cells become rapidly cohered to that resonance, there would be some sort of effect. This could range from an increase in heart problems (the heart being the processor which is the precursor to the brain according to Heart Math), to violence. It would be interesting to monitor the translation of solar electrons into the Earth's ionosphere to see how rapidly the intake at the S Pole takes up at the N. Anyone interested should look at what happened in Cape Town during the spike of November 9th. At least 20 people shot in violent outbursts in one area resulting in temporary military intervention.
Reply
10/9/2018 11:16:24 am
So can you explain Sept 7th thru Sept 10th as not increasing, please?
Reply
Julie
10/9/2018 04:48:23 pm
Buzz
Reply
I don't understand, ..why the "play on words" in this thread? Quanta and physical matter is distinguished by its frequency. Amplitude is a parameter used to quantify the power of energy, not its frequency. The only parameter related to Schumann Resonance that effects life on the planet ..is the increase in the peak frequency and its duration ..while all other considerations are pointless. And posting disinformation to the contrary, and then moderating peoples comments, is the willful and blatant suppression about what's really happening. so, ..I suspect my comment won't be approved!
Camshiva
30/12/2019 01:45:39 pm
I've been an audio engineer, musician and experimenter for many years... so let me throw in my opinion on this. The frequency "increase" claims are confusing to most but think of it this way; on an old AM/FM radio you can tune into a specific FREQUENCY (lets say "Rock 7.83!")... but that rock station decides how much power (amplitude) it pumps into its antenna and therefore drives how LOUD the signal is and consequently how far it goes as well.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWelcome to Julie's Diamond Light Blog. Sign up below for the newsletter to be advised when new posts/ new information is available! Archives
September 2017
Categories
All
|